Funding News

ARMA Awards 2016: Finalists Announced!
Celebrating innovation and success in research management and administration.

Nominations for the ARMA Awards 2016 are now closed. The winners will be announced at our 2016 Annual Conference Awards Dinner on Tuesday 7 June at Hilton Birmingham Metropole.

Recognition and celebration of innovation and success, both on an individual and team level, should be par for the course for an ARMA member and is an important ingredient for galvanising a community spirit amongst the profession. Supporting pioneering, world-class research requires innovative and effective research management and administration; and following the successful launch of The Carter Award in 2014, we are proud to present the ARMA Awards, recognising the sector’s leading research support professionals. 

The 2016 ARMA Awards are proudly sponsored by Research Media, ARMA’s Strategic Media Partner.

Why enter the awards?

  • Celebrate colleagues’ achievements by putting forward a nomination.
  • Showcase your successes and share your best practice with a growing, global professional community.
  • Stand out as a member of an exceptional profession.
  • Share your accomplishments and innovative thinking with your peers.
  • Be recognised for your pioneering approaches to research management and administration.
  • Enhance your team’s and/or organisation’s profile and reputation.

For more information, please visit this website.


Open letter from Alain Beaudet, President of CIHR, to Canada’s health researchers
April 14, 2016

Dear colleagues,

I am writing to you today to reaffirm CIHR’s commitment to promote Canadian health research excellence and to engage with Canada’s health research community.

As you are I am sure aware, in Budget 2016, the Government of Canada provided CIHR with an additional $30 million per year. This sends a strong signal that the new Government is firmly committed to supporting health research, and specifically investigator-initiated research, including basic science.

This new investment will be entirely dedicated to the ongoing and future Project Grant competitions with a focus on early career investigators.

Many of you have expressed concerns about the outcomes of the current Project Grant competition pilot, which is part of the transition into the new set of investigator-initiated programs launched by CIHR to better meet its mandate of supporting excellence in all areas of health research, while decreasing the administrative burden on researchers and improving the quality, fairness, and transparency of peer review.

I am keenly aware of these concerns and have taken steps to ensure that wherever possible, course corrections would be applied to ensure that the program runs smoothly and sustainably.

Thus, scientists will be involved in the reviewer selection process and mechanisms will be put in place to ensure Chair-mediated online discussions when there are major disparities in the percent rankings of reviewers.

Scientists who have served as Virtual Chairs for the online process will also be members of the face to face panels for increased continuity between the two stages of the review.

Finally, I wish to reassure the community that, contrary to rumours, the 2016 Project Grant competition (the second pilot) will be held in the fall as planned.

This being said, the funding situation remains challenging, given that our funding capacity has not kept pace with the growth of the application pressure. The current Project Grant competition will therefore be highly competitive. But as we committed before implementing the reforms, the total number of Principal Investigators funded through the open grants competition envelope will not be decreased.

I am acutely aware that the current transitional period has brought uncertainty and anxiety to many in the community. The old system was well understood and, therefore, predictable. The new system is still being piloted, creating less predictability and, therefore, more unease.

I want you to know that CIHR is aware and cares about your concerns, and that we are listening to your feedback. Many of you already offered sound and helpful advice on ways to improve the system, and I thank you for your insight.

We have made many changes to our processes in response to this feedback and intend to continue doing so as time goes on. In fact, my intent is that moving forward, we adopt new ways to communicate and work together that will ensure greater clarity and transparency.

This open letter is a first step in that direction.

Alain Beaudet, MD, PhD
President, Canadian Institutes of Health Research


Michael Smith Foundation for Health Research – Summary Document Highlights New Funding Programs
March 21, 2016

As announced last month, MSFHR is developing an expanded suite of funding programs that will build on our established support for BC health researchers.

Six new programs in various stages of development will meet specific funding needs identified through stakeholder consultation. These programs will complement our existing salary awards – the Scholar Program for early-career investigators and the Research Trainee Program for post-doctoral fellows – both of which will be offered on an annual basis starting in fall 2016.

To increase awareness of these programs, we have created a new summary document that is available for download. This document outlines the purpose and general objectives of each program, the expected frequency of award competitions and, where available, proposed award terms and amounts.

An overview of the full program suite is also available on our website. This page will be updated regularly as new details emerge.

We know that members of BC’s health research community have valuable insights and ideas that will help us optimize the design of these programs. We are committed to a consultative approach that will invite focused input on each program from key stakeholders across the province. Plans for this consultation are being developed in conversation with university and health authority leaders in each BC region.

We are committed to transparency as we move forward with the development of our expanded program suite. Make sure to receive the latest news and updates by subscribing to our newsletter and following us on Twitter and LinkedIn.

For inquiries related to these funding programs, please contact:
Les Grad
Manager, Research Programs (Design & Development)
604.714.2773
lgrad@msfhr.org


Communication of Competition Results

SSHRC has improved and harmonized the communication of competition results given to applicants and institutions. These changes come as a result of a review aimed at determining what feedback could be provided following adjudication that would:

  • Provide applicants with the decision (offered/not offered);
  • Allow applicants and institutions to situate the individual results within a larger context; and
  • Allow institutions to situate the results of their cohort of applicants within a large context.

New this year:

  • Applications will be “offered”, “conditionally offered”, or “not offered” funding
  • Elimination of the “recommended, not funded” category
  • Collection of all applications into one overall group by rank and divided by relative rank into sextiles
  • Results for the applicants will be provided on a one-page form that includes individual, committee, and overall results and statistics including the sextile in which their application placed
  • Institutions will receive overall and institutional competition statistics on the secure site (not for public dissemination until the official public announcement has occurred) in addition to their applicants’ results by sextiles (presented in alphabetical, not rank order) and the award decisions

At this time, changes will be made in the communication of results to the Insight Grants (IG), Insight Development Grants (IDG), Partnership Grants Letter of Intent (PG-LOI), and Partnership Development Grants (PDG) funding opportunities.

These changes are based on feedback received from the research community that the number of applications that were “Recommended, not funded” had increased in most funding opportunities over the years and the proportion of applications deemed “Recommended, not funded” was inconsistent from one opportunity to another, which made results difficult to interpret. Furthermore, it was found that the large number of “Recommended, not funded” applications sent mixed messages to individual applicants since only a small proportion of these applications are funded by SSHRC on an annual basis.

Effective immediately, the “Recommended, not funded” category has been eliminated. Applicants will now be informed that their application was either “Offered”, “Conditionally Offered”, or “Not Offered” an award. Furthermore, the results of all applications within each funding opportunity will be collected, grouped based on overall rank and divided into sextiles. The fifth and sixth sextiles (or bottom third) will be combined into one group. Applicants, as well as their institution, will be informed into which sextile category their application fell, in relation to all applications submitted to that competition. Applicants will continue to receive information on where their application ranked (by committee).

Applicants will receive the following:

a.     Overall competition statistics
b.     Results for their specific application
i.      Decision (Offered/Conditionally Offered/Not Offered)
ii.      Final Scores
iii.      Rank within the committee
iv.      Sextile category in overall ranking
v.      Committee comments (if applicable)
vi.      External Assessments / Expert Panel Reports (if applicable)

SSHRC will also provide institutions with more information regarding the results of the applicants from their institution and overall standing in the competition.

Institutions will receive the following:

a.     Overall competition statistics
b.     Institution competition statistics
c.     Results for all applications submitted via the institution:
i.      Decision (Offered/Conditionally Offered/Not Offered)
ii.      Recommended Amount (for those offered an award)
iii.      Sextile category in overall rankings (the list of applicants will appear in
alphabetical order within the sextile category.

The results of the most recent Insight Grants and Partnership Development Grants competitions will be released in the coming weeks on the secure site; however, do not hesitate to contact Andrew Wakefield should you have any questions.

Dominique Bérubé, PhD
Vice-president, Research programs | Vice-présidente, Programmes de recherche
Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
Conseil de recherches en sciences humaines du Canada
350 Albert Street  |  350, rue Albert, Ottawa, ON   K1P 6G4
E  |  C   dominique.berube@sshrc-crsh.gc.ca
T  613.995.5495   
www.sshrc-crsh.gc.ca
Andrew Wakefield
A / Manager,   | Gestionnaire p. i. 
Programs Planning and Operations Division | |  Division de la planification et des opérations des programmes
Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
Conseil de recherches en sciences humaines du Canada


350 Albert Street  |  350, rue Albert, Ottawa, ON   K1P 6G4
E  |  C   andrew.wakefield@sshrc-crsh.gc.ca
T  613.947.4095   
www.sshrc-crsh.gc.ca

New: Joint Call for International Collaborative Projects on the Sustainable Management of Water Resources in Agriculture, Forestry, and Freshwater Aquaculture

The Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) would like to remind the community of its involvement in the Water JPI Joint Call focusing on the sustainable management of water resources in agriculture, forestry and freshwater aquaculture sectors.

Alongside Canada’s International Development Research Centre (IDRC), NSERC is collaborating with 21 countries to support this call. NSERC’s participation in this joint program reinforces the importance of fostering close relationships with domestic and international partners. Going global allows our research community to access a pool of knowledge and expertise to further contribute to world-class research.

Two types of projects are available through this funding opportunity:

  • Projects involving Canadian researchers and their European partners; and
  • Projects involving Canadian researchers, European partners and researchers from low and middle income countries (LMICs).

Canadian researchers may be eligible for NSERC funding through both types of projects. NSERC will provide up to $750,000 CAD in total funding to the 2016 join call. IDRC’s funding envelope totals $250,000 CAD and will be reserved for applicants from LMICs.

Interested applicants should consult the 2016 Joint Call web platform.

In addition, there is an opportunity for Canadian researchers to obtain funding to support the mobility of students in their proposals, through the MITACS Globalink Research Awards and Globalink Partnership Awards. This provides an excellent opportunity for senior undergraduates and graduate students to undertake research in a university lab or complete a research internship at a company in Europe in successfully-funded projects. In total, Mitacs will provide support for up to 10 students per year for a total of $50,000 CAD per year.

For more information on Canada’s participation in this joint call, please contact NSERC at 613-943-1320 or waterworks@nserc-crsng.gc.ca.


CARA Webinar Setting the Context: Syrian Refugee Resettlement in Canada

In April 2016, Immigration, Refugee and Citizenship Canada (IRCC) and the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (SSHRC) will formally announce the launch of a joint initiative and call for proposals to support peer-reviewed research on Syrian refugee resettlement in Canada. The call for applications will open in April 2016, with links on both IRCC and SSHRC websites.

The key objective of this joint initiative and call is to award supplementary support to active SSHRC funded researchers working in areas related to immigration and refugee resettlement. The call seeks to support research addressing pressing short-term issues related to the current refugee resettlement effort, in order to inform and support the efforts of policymakers, service organization, and other stakeholders.

In support of the call, IRCC and SSHRC are offering a series of three webinars focusing on 1) policy and operational context, 2) research data, and 3) research support. 

Webinar
Organizer
Date
Time
Contact
Webinar 1: 
Context
IRCC
Wednesday
March 30, 2016
1:00 p.m. – 2:00 p.m. ET
ChuDou Lynhiavu, IRCC
ChuDou.Lynhiavu@cic.gc.ca
613-437-6159
Monica van Huystee, IRCC
Monica.vanHuystee@cic.gc.ca
613-437-6175
Webinar 2:
Data
IRCC 
Wednesday
April 6, 2016
1:00 p.m. – 2:00 p.m. ET
Webinar 3:
Research  Support
SSHRC
Wednesday
April 13, 2016
1:00 p.m. – 2:00 p.m. ET
Jacques Critchley,   SSHRC
613- 992- 5145  

Webinar Meetings – Call-in Details

Topic: Setting the context – Syrian Refugee Resettlement in Canada
Date: Wednesday, March 30, 2016
Time: 1:00pm, Eastern Daylight Time (New York, GMT 0:400)
Meeting Number: 551 805 179

To join the online meeting:
1) Go to https://gts-ee.webex.com/gts-ee/j.php?MTID=m58b56c8d2f7aa9291d78e997a4550778 
2) If requested, enter your name and email address
3) If a password is required, enter the meeting password: Refugee
4) Click “Join”


NSERC Participating in New Digging Into Data Challenge Competition

NSERC is pleased to announced that it is participating in the 2016 Digging into Data Challenge funding competition launched by the Trans-Atlantic Platform (T-AP).

By collaborating with the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council (SSHRC) and the Fonds de recherche du Quebec – Societe et culture (FRQNT/FRQSC), NSERC sees the competition as an opportunity to support research projects that use “big data” to address questions in the social and natural sciences, humanities and engineering. This research is expected to involve sets of data so large and/or complex that traditional processing applications are inadequate. These data sets can include sources such as texts, images, music, photographs, audio or audiovisual data.

“The Trans-Atlantic Platform offers an important venue for global research collaboration,” said B. Mario Pinto, President of the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada. “I am pleased to support a computer science and mathematics research component as part of this worthwhile endeavour. Researchers are generating exponentially increasing amounts of data. New data mining techniques to analyze them promise breakthrough discoveries with benefits as far-ranging as they are unexpected.”

NSERC will fund the computer science and mathematics component of up to six projects with up to $100,000. The projects must involve both social sciences or humanities partners and partners outside of Canada. SSHRC-eligible partners can also apply for up to $100,000 for the project. If the project lead is based in Quebec, the project leader can apply to the FRQSC/FRQNT for an additional supplement of up to $75,000, bringing the total maximum Canadian funding for a project to $275,000.

More information is available on the Trans-Atlantic Platform website.